- Dr Bart's Newsletter
- Posts
- A Product Manager can enable an Agile team. Or completely break it.
A Product Manager can enable an Agile team. Or completely break it.
Which one are you?
Agile teams rarely fail because of Scrum, Kanban, or the framework itself.
They fail because of people.
And very often, the weakest link is not engineering.
It is the Product Manager.

Agile productivity is limited by its weakest constraint. If a key role does not understand its responsibility, the entire system suffers. Flow slows down. Morale drops. Delivery becomes chaotic. Trust erodes. Missed goals turn into blame games.
That is not an Agile problem.
That is a leadership problem.
So let us talk honestly about how a Product Manager can become the main source of dysfunction in an Agile team. Not out of bad intent, but usually out of pressure, insecurity, or misunderstanding of the role.
1) Micromanaging
Micromanagement is one of the fastest ways to destroy an Agile team. When a PM dictates how a feature should be implemented instead of focusing on what problem needs solving, autonomy disappears.
Engineers stop thinking. They stop proposing ideas. They stop caring. They execute instructions instead of owning outcomes.
Agile teams are built on trust in expertise. When you take that away, velocity drops even if people are “busy”.
What to fix immediately
Shift from solution statements to problem statements
Ask “What options do we have?” instead of “Build it like this”
Judge outcomes and learning, not lines of code or task completion
Explicitly tell engineers you trust their technical decisions
2) Positioning yourself at the center stage
If every decision, update, clarification, and approval goes through you, you are not enabling the team. You are becoming a bottleneck.
Great PMs create clarity and then step back. Weak PMs insert themselves everywhere to feel relevant.
And yes, this includes Daily. The PM or PO does not need to attend Daily unless there is a specific reason. Daily is not a status meeting for Product.
What to fix immediately
Remove yourself from meetings where you add no direct value
Let engineers and designers talk to each other without mediation
Replace control with transparency through clear goals and priorities
Ask yourself weekly where am I blocking flow instead of enabling it
3) Trying to appear as the technical expert
You do not need to code to be a great PM.
You do need humility.
Pretending to understand things you do not, or constantly second guessing engineers on technical decisions, is a fast track to losing credibility. Engineers can sense this immediately.
Your job is not to be the smartest person in the room. It is to make sure the smartest people can do their best work.
What to fix immediately
Admit openly when something is outside your expertise
Ask clarifying questions instead of making statements
Focus on constraints, risks, and trade-offs, not implementation
Learn enough to communicate, not enough to dominate
4) Too many meetings
Nothing kills momentum like a calendar full of meetings.
Context switching is expensive. Deep work requires long, uninterrupted blocks of time.
When developers spend more time in meetings than building, you will get slow delivery and low quality no matter how “aligned” everyone feels.
Meetings should exist to reduce work, not create it.
What to fix immediately
Audit recurring meetings and cancel aggressively
Replace sync meetings with written updates
Set clear agendas and outcomes for every meeting
Protect engineering focus time as a priority, not a luxury
5) Expecting too many deliverables too fast
Agile does not mean faster by default.
It means adaptable.
Pushing teams to constantly increase output without addressing capacity, complexity, or technical debt leads to burnout and shallow work. You might get more shipped, but you will get less value.
Velocity has limits. Pretending otherwise just shifts cost into quality and morale.
What to fix immediately
Stop equating productivity with the number of tickets closed
Make trade-offs explicit when asking for more scope
Protect quality as a first-class constraint
Use retrospectives to adjust expectations, not just process
6) Resonating your own pressure and frustration to the team
Stakeholders push Product. Product pushes Engineering.
That sounds logical, but it is destructive.
A PM’s role is to absorb chaos, not amplify it. When your stress becomes the team’s stress, psychological safety disappears. People stop raising risks early because they fear reaction instead of collaboration.
Pressure should be translated into clarity, not anxiety.
What to fix immediately
Separate urgency from panic
Shield the team from unnecessary stakeholder noise
Bring problems with context and options, not emotions
Model calm decision-making under pressure
7) Not listening to team feedback
Your team is closest to reality. They see constraints, risks, and hidden dependencies long before any roadmap does.
Ignoring their feedback does not make problems disappear. It only delays them until they explode during delivery.
Challenging the team is healthy. Dismissing them is not.
What to fix immediately
Treat pushback as a signal, not resistance
Ask “What am I missing?” regularly
Close feedback loops explicitly so people feel heard
Adjust plans when reality changes
8) Turning Agile into a waterfall with better branding
If your backlog is fully locked six months ahead, change requests feel illegal, and learning does not influence plans, you are not Agile.
You are running a waterfall with sprints.
Agile without adaptability is just process theater. And once teams realize this, the entire structure loses credibility.
What to fix immediately
Plan in horizons, not fixed long-term commitments
Make learning an explicit input into planning
Keep room for change without guilt or blame
Treat the roadmap as a hypothesis, not a contract
9) Using Daily as a reporting ceremony
Daily is not a status meeting.
It is not a PM update.
It is not a progress report.
Daily exists for the team to synchronize, identify blockers, and adjust their plan. Yet in practice, it often turns into people talking to the PM instead of each other.
That is a subtle but damaging shift.
What to fix immediately
Stop treating Daily as a reporting ritual
Let the team own the Daily without PM control
Focus on blockers and coordination, not achievements
Attend only when needed, not by default
10) Optimizing for output instead of outcomes
This is the most dangerous mistake because it looks productive on paper.
Shipping features is easy. Creating value is hard. When PMs optimize for output, teams deliver more while impact stagnates. Metrics flatten. Users do not care.
Agile was meant to shorten feedback loops, not inflate backlogs.
What to fix immediately
Tie work to clear user and business outcomes
Review success after delivery, not just completion
Kill or iterate on features that do not perform
Reward learning, not just shipping
How Daily should work vs how it often works
In theory, Daily is a short-term synchronization. Engineers talk to each other. They align on what they are doing today, where they are blocked, and how to help one another.
In practice, Daily often becomes:
A status report to the PM
A performance stage
A meeting where problems are hidden to look good
When this happens, Daily loses its value. Flow slows. Issues surface late. Trust erodes quietly.
A healthy Daily meeting feels boring to outsiders. That is a good sign.
Final thought
Most Agile failures are not caused by bad frameworks.
They are caused by well-intentioned PMs playing the wrong role.
Awareness is the first fix.
Are you guilty of any of these?
Be honest. Most of us have been at some point.
If you want to go deeper, join me at my tomorrow’s live event where I break down the small and big actions you can take to land a PM role in 2026 and actually thrive in it.